Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: CAN-2005-2802 split into separate CANs]

2005-09-12 Thread David S. Miller
From: Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:41:28 +0900 > Is there any discussion of how that should be done floating around, > and how much work do you think would be involved? Not really, Patrick McHardy and myself simply decided that is what is needed last time this got discussed

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: CAN-2005-2802 split into separate CANs]

2005-09-12 Thread Horms
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:07:51PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:43:28 +0200 > > > Dave Miller didn't like the usage of xtime.tv_sec (via get_seconds()), > > as it can be changed from the outside which may cause problems. S

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: CAN-2005-2802 split into separate CANs]

2005-09-12 Thread David S. Miller
From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:43:28 +0200 > Dave Miller didn't like the usage of xtime.tv_sec (via get_seconds()), > as it can be changed from the outside which may cause problems. So, > in short, I have to find a better fix (although I'm perfectly happy >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: CAN-2005-2802 split into separate CANs]

2005-09-12 Thread Juergen Kreileder
oting the rest for the sake of clarity: > Also, is the a reason this correspondence can't go to debian-kernel? > >> >> Cheers, >> Moritz >> >> - Forwarded message from "Steven M. Christey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> - >> >

CAN-2005-2802 split into separate CANs

2005-09-12 Thread Horms
OTECTED]> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: CAN-2005-2802 split into separate CANs] X-Cluestick: seven On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:14:49AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Hi Horms, > can you please > a) correct the changelog in SVN Done. > b) check whether CAN-2005-2873 is fix