On Sun, Aug 05, 2012 at 07:43:50PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 10:06:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > A possible solution would be something like:
> > 1. Keep multiple versions of udebs in the same suite (currently possible
> > for arch:all, but maybe not supported for
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 10:06:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> A possible solution would be something like:
> 1. Keep multiple versions of udebs in the same suite (currently possible
> for arch:all, but maybe not supported for arch-dependent packages)
Breaks the expectations within d-i. This is
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 14:06 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 13:53:17 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > Now that d-i wheezy beta1 is finally out, I'll try and figure out what
> > exactly breaks in d-i when the linux kernelgets its ABI bumped. Apparently
> > netboot and mini
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 13:53:17 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Now that d-i wheezy beta1 is finally out, I'll try and figure out what
> exactly breaks in d-i when the linux kernelgets its ABI bumped. Apparently
> netboot and mini.iso are concerned, but it would be nice to have that
> checked, an
Hi Ben,
Ben Hutchings (03/08/2012):
> Byte queue limits (BQL) are an important step in reducing 'bufferbloat'
> and network latency on Linux. The feature was introduced in Linux 3.3
> and has had a few bug fixes since then; I think it can be considered
> stable now. It requires specific support
Byte queue limits (BQL) are an important step in reducing 'bufferbloat'
and network latency on Linux. The feature was introduced in Linux 3.3
and has had a few bug fixes since then; I think it can be considered
stable now. It requires specific support in drivers and is then
unconditionally enable
6 matches
Mail list logo
