Re: Bugs from 2.6.8 packages

2008-06-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-20 00:33]: > thanks for nuking the rest with a nice message to users :) I've done that now. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Bugs from 2.6.8 packages

2008-06-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, dann frazier wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:13:43AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > There are quite a few bug reports from 2.6.8 kernel packages. I was > > going to reassign them to linux-2.6, but then wondered whether this > > actually makes any sense. > > My sugges

Re: Bugs from 2.6.8 packages

2008-06-10 Thread dann frazier
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:13:43AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > There are quite a few bug reports from 2.6.8 kernel packages. I was > going to reassign them to linux-2.6, but then wondered whether this > actually makes any sense. My suggestion would be to close them all with a note requesting

Bugs from 2.6.8 packages

2008-06-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
There are quite a few bug reports from 2.6.8 kernel packages. I was going to reassign them to linux-2.6, but then wondered whether this actually makes any sense. Does anyone feel it's worth looking at these bugs (maks in particular, since he's doing most of this work) or should I simply close all