Re: Bug #266882 still not fixed

2005-01-07 Thread Tomasz Malesinski
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:25:41PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Tomasz Malesinski wrote: > > > Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm > > > volatile("fnclex ; fwait");)

Re: Bug #266882 still not fixed

2005-01-07 Thread Martin Schulze
Horms wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:25:41PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Tomasz Malesinski wrote: > > > > Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm > > > > vol

Re: Bug #266882 still not fixed

2005-01-06 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:41:51AM +0900, Horms wrote: > Understood. Would it be helpful if security patches for the 2.4 kernel > were forwarded to the security-team as they are added to SVN for > inclusion in unstable and thus testing? Yes, absolutely. > Perhaps being better about opening entri

Re: Bug #266882 still not fixed

2005-01-06 Thread Horms
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 03:25:41PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Tomasz Malesinski wrote: > > > Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm > > > volatile("fnclex ; fwait");)

Re: Bug #266882 still not fixed

2005-01-03 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Tomasz Malesinski wrote: > > Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm > > volatile("fnclex ; fwait");) has not been fixed in 2.4.18 for so long? > > That and a host of others.

Re: Bug #266882 still not fixed

2004-12-14 Thread Horms
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Tomasz Malesinski wrote: > Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm > volatile("fnclex ; fwait");) has not been fixed in 2.4.18 for so long? That and a host of others. Security-Team, Is there ever going to be a new kernel for Woody?

Bug #266882 still not fixed

2004-12-14 Thread Tomasz Malesinski
Why hasn't the bug #266882 (CAN-2004-0554 i387.h in kernel: asm volatile("fnclex ; fwait");) has not been fixed in 2.4.18 for so long? Tomasz Malesiński