Source: linux
Source-Version: 5.13.9-1~exp1
Hi Nicolas,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:03:01AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> notfound 969223 6.12.9-1
> thanks
> ---
>
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 04:41:54PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:53:
notfound 969223 6.12.9-1
thanks
---
Hi Salvatore,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 04:41:54PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:53:44PM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:20:29PM +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 969223 6.12.9-1
Bug #969223 [src:linux] Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns
No longer marked as found in versions linux/6.12.9-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
969223: https://bugs
Hi
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:53:44PM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:20:29PM +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 07:09:43AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > > On Wed 03 Mar 2021 22:50:44 GMT Sheng
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:20:29PM +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 07:09:43AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > On Wed 03 Mar 2021 22:50:44 GMT Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wr
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #969223 [src:linux] Can't rm directory on overlayfs in userns
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
969223: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 07:09:43AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> On Wed 03 Mar 2021 22:50:44 GMT Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > > On Wed 03 Mar 2021 17:33:16 GMT Shengjing Zhu write:
> > > >
> > > > On
On Wed 03 Mar 2021 22:50:44 GMT Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > On Wed 03 Mar 2021 17:33:16 GMT Shengjing Zhu write:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:40 PM Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > > > > [2]:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> On Wed 03 Mar 2021 17:33:16 GMT Shengjing Zhu write:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:40 PM Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > > > [2]:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/CAJfpegsiuf8ib5cvVrr=zhz+xu7bmmtt2eyapseudmpcrbu...@mail.
On Wed 03 Mar 2021 17:33:16 GMT Shengjing Zhu write:
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:40 PM Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > > [2]:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/CAJfpegsiuf8ib5cvVrr=zhz+xu7bmmtt2eyapseudmpcrbu...@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> >
> > The overlay fs patchset [2] has been merged and wit
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 3:40 PM Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > [2]:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/CAJfpegsiuf8ib5cvVrr=zhz+xu7bmmtt2eyapseudmpcrbu...@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
>
> The overlay fs patchset [2] has been merged and with v5.10.13 (tested
> on linux-image-5.10.0-3-arm64) the issue is n
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 09:10 AM Nicolas Schier wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:57 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:52 AM Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think I just mess up when debugging. It seems it never works.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe we should revert permit_m
On Tue, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:57 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:52 AM Nicolas Schier wrote:
> >
> > > I think I just mess up when debugging. It seems it never works.
> > >
> > > Maybe we should revert permit_mounts_in_userns? as it doesn't seem to
> > > work. Buster is also aff
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:52 AM Nicolas Schier wrote:
>
> > I think I just mess up when debugging. It seems it never works.
> >
> > Maybe we should revert permit_mounts_in_userns? as it doesn't seem to
> > work. Buster is also affected.
>
> Please, don't be too fast when thinking about a revert.
> I think I just mess up when debugging. It seems it never works.
>
> Maybe we should revert permit_mounts_in_userns? as it doesn't seem to
> work. Buster is also affected.
Please, don't be too fast when thinking about a revert. Several of my
colleagues (Debian users) cling to the feature since
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:58 PM Nicolas Schier wrote:
> > If I upgrade a debian10 VM to testing, it seems to work.
> > However if I boot a new debian testing VM, it seems not to work.
> > Both VMs are downloaded from http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/cloud/
> > What can be the difference here? I'm
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:52:41AM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 10:13 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > Source: linux
> > Version: 5.7.10-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > After enabling overlayfs for userns, I find it doesn't work as expected.
> >
> > $ cat /sys/mo
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 10:13 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> Source: linux
> Version: 5.7.10-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> After enabling overlayfs for userns, I find it doesn't work as expected.
>
> $ cat /sys/module/overlay/parameters/permit_mounts_in_userns
> Y
>
> zsj@debian:~/test$ pwd
> /hom
Source: linux
Version: 5.7.10-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
After enabling overlayfs for userns, I find it doesn't work as expected.
$ cat /sys/module/overlay/parameters/permit_mounts_in_userns
Y
zsj@debian:~/test$ pwd
/home/zsj/test
zsj@debian:~/test$ tree
.
├── lower
│ └── a
│ └── a
├── mer
19 matches
Mail list logo
