Bug#964734: reopened / test with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3

2021-10-18 Thread Bernhard Turmann
Hello Salvatore, Am 17.10.21 um 14:56 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: Is this issue still present with a recent kernel from unstable or bullseye-backports? Yes, unfortunately, I just tested with 5.14.9-2~bpo11+1 and can confirm the same issue. (using "options ddbridge msi=1" still works as a w

Bug#964734: reopened / test with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3

2021-10-17 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Bernhard, On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 07:11:09PM +0200, Bernhard Turmann wrote: > Hallo Salvatore, > > Am 02.05.21 um 15:00 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > > > Reopened until the resolution is clarified upstream. > > Was there some further progress/clarification from upstream? > I just tested with

Bug#964734: reopened / test with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3

2021-05-03 Thread Bernhard Turmann
Hallo Salvatore, Am 02.05.21 um 15:00 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: Reopened until the resolution is clarified upstream. Was there some further progress/clarification from upstream? I just tested with 5.12.0-11146-g8ca5297e7e3 to no avail and reported the result upstream / asked for any update

Processed: Re: Bug#964734: reopened

2021-05-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #964734 [src:linux] linux-image-4.19.0-9-amd64: [bisected] i2c timeout loading module ddbridge Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 964734: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964734 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.or

Bug#964734: reopened

2021-05-02 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Bernhard, On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 09:18:53AM +0200, Bernhard Turmann wrote: > Reopened until the resolution is clarified upstream. Was there some further progress/clarification from upstream? Regards, Salvatore

Bug#964734: reopened

2020-09-11 Thread Bernhard Turmann
Reopened until the resolution is clarified upstream.