Your message dated Mon, 30 Mar 2020 08:10:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953569: fixed in linux 5.5.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #953569,
regarding linux: please cherry-pick wireguard patches from 5.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Thanks! Looks good to me. I appreciate that you were able to
reconstruct the original upstream commits for each of these.
(WireGuard has a capital G btw.)
On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 00:01 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> It looks like you didn't actually take these patches from the updated
> tree I sent you, but rather used the outdated .zip I had posted prior.
> Please try again using the tree I linked earlier:
>
> https://git.zx2c4.com
Hi again,
It looks like you didn't actually take these patches from the updated
tree I sent you, but rather used the outdated .zip I had posted prior.
Please try again using the tree I linked earlier:
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/log/?h=backport-5.5.y
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:18 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 03:21 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 22:23 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:52 PM Ben Hutchings
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A.
On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 03:21 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 22:23 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:52 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > > Please coordinate with me for doing this. Actua
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 22:23 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:52 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > Please coordinate with me for doing this. Actually, if this sounds
> > > interesting to you, I'll backport it m
Hi Ben,
I continue to maintain and keep up to date the 5.5.y backport for
WireGuard for you. I don't know when you intend on merging this --
after 5.6 drops, I assume -- but I've updated the patches and I'm now
holding them in the wireguard-linux repo:
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/log/?h
On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 19:04 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> By the way, do you want a patch series for 5.4 too? I can provide
> that as well.
Thanks, but I don't anticipate there being any further 5.4-based kernel
packages in Debian.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Tomorrow will be cancelled due to la
By the way, do you want a patch series for 5.4 too? I can provide that as well.
On Tue 2020-03-10 22:23:18 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> https://data.zx2c4.com/wireguard-5.5.8-20a586ec4f5acf195f71caea55c5a33c574078cb69712da591467ffc08dd8b72.zip
Thanks, Jason!
> - A user is on stock Debian and runs `apt install wireguard`: only
> wireguard-tools is pulled in.
> - A user
On Wed 2020-03-11 03:50:00 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> If some of the packages providing a virtual package are explicitly
> installed, and some auto-installed, it could reasonably auto-remove the
> latter group (though I don't think it does). But if all of them are
> auto-installed, which will b
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:52 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Please coordinate with me for doing this. Actually, if this sounds
> > interesting to you, I'll backport it myself, along with the missing
> > crypto/ bits, and send you a git
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 23:31 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Thanks to Ben and Jason for following up here.
>
> On Wed 2020-03-11 02:52:43 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > We definitely can't add a Provides on "real" kernel packages, because
> > this breaks auto-removal of old packages.
>
> I'm
Thanks to Ben and Jason for following up here.
On Wed 2020-03-11 02:52:43 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> We definitely can't add a Provides on "real" kernel packages, because
> this breaks auto-removal of old packages.
I'm not sure i understand this. by "real" kernel packages i think you
mean som
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 17:02 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Please coordinate with me for doing this. Actually, if this sounds
> interesting to you, I'll backport it myself, along with the missing
> crypto/ bits, and send you a git bundle of patches for 5.5.
>
> In other words, just say "yes pl
Please coordinate with me for doing this. Actually, if this sounds
interesting to you, I'll backport it myself, along with the missing
crypto/ bits, and send you a git bundle of patches for 5.5.
In other words, just say "yes please", and I'll supply the rest. Then
you can apply this to your tree a
Package: src:linux
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 src:wireguard-linux-compat src:wireguard
Hi Debian kernel folks--
Please cherry-pick the wireguard patches from Linux's 5.6 development
branch into future debian builds of 5.5 (and 5.4?) builds of the Linux
kernel.
The Wireguard VPN mecha
18 matches
Mail list logo
