Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules

2021-04-23 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
hi, On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 06:11:50PM -0400, thom...@fastmail.cn wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Control: severity -1 wishlist > > > > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 17:21 -0400, thom...@fastmail.cn wrote: > > > package: src:linux > > > I think less running code w

Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules

2019-08-06 Thread thomasw
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Control: severity -1 wishlist > > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 17:21 -0400, thom...@fastmail.cn wrote: > > package: src:linux > > I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is > > always a good thing, therefore, I propose t

Processed: Re: Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules

2019-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 wishlist Bug #934090 [src:linux] built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' -- 934090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934090 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble

Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules

2019-08-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: severity -1 wishlist On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 17:21 -0400, thom...@fastmail.cn wrote: > package: src:linux > I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is > always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of > built-in. > > CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD > CONF

Bug#934090: built-in PINCTRL drivers should be modules

2019-08-06 Thread thomasw
package: src:linux I think less running code when possible and a smaller linux image is always a good thing, therefore, I propose these as modules instead of built-in. CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD CONFIG_PINCTRL_CHERRYVIEW CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL CONFIG_PINCTRL_CANNONLAKE CONFIG_PINCTRL_CEDARFORK CONFIG_PINCT