On 2018-02-03 10:54:18, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:25:31PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> > There are, however, people *not* running Debian-built kernels, and
>> > sometimes for good reasons. This is a configuration that we should
>
On Sat, 2018-02-03 at 00:45 +, Craig Small wrote:
> Hi Antoine (and kernel and security teams),
> Thanks for giving me the background as it's a kernel vulnerability not a
> Procps one I wasn't aware of it.
It's not a kernel vulnerability, but a class of application
vulnerabilities that the k
Hi
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 09:25:31PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > There are, however, people *not* running Debian-built kernels, and
> > sometimes for good reasons. This is a configuration that we should
> > still support.
>
> Is it supported, but it's also clearl
Hi Antoine (and kernel and security teams),
Thanks for giving me the background as it's a kernel vulnerability not a
Procps one I wasn't aware of it.
The change to Procps is pretty simple but given that you need to be running
a non Debian kernel without this parameter what's groups' opinion of t
4 matches
Mail list logo
