Hi,
I guess the kernel will be rebuilt due to the ARM64 breakage but I confirm
it works fine on the following machines :
Intel Core i7 4790 w/ GeForce GTX 1070 and NVidia BLOB 384.111
Intel Core i7 4800 MQ
Intel Pentium N3700
AMD Phenom x4 9840 w/ GeForce GTX 970 and NVidia BLOB 384.111
However i
On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 14:00 +0100, Julien Aubin wrote:
> I guess the kernel will be rebuilt due to the ARM64 breakage
Yes, I'll push a -2 with ABI change ignored on arm64.
>
> but I confirm it works fine on the following machines :
> Intel Core i7 4790 w/ GeForce GTX 1070 and NVidia BLOB 384.111
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 20:34 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > No, that's not necessary. But could you wait a day or two so I have a
> > chance to review your work?
>
> Sure, I'd welcome a review on this actually :)
Hi Ben,
4.9.80-1 is ready for me. I'm not totally sure how to interpret:
2018
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 18:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > So you want to include the patch even if it's reverted upstream?
>
> Oh, I misunderstood what you were saying. No I don't. But I think it
> makes sense to trigger a rebuild of modules once the retpoline compiler
> support is in place.
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 19:27 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 18:24 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > So I went ahead an updated to 4.9.78 and added the revert for the VERMAGIC
> > > stuff (which is queued for 4.9.79).
> >
> > This makes sense. I think once an updated gcc is
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 18:24 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > So I went ahead an updated to 4.9.78 and added the revert for the VERMAGIC
> > stuff (which is queued for 4.9.79).
>
> This makes sense. I think once an updated gcc is available in stretch
> we should bump the ABI number and Build-Depend
On Sun, 2018-01-28 at 18:42 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 13:52 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >
> > work on 4.9.77 is mostly done, so yes I'd like to push it to stretch before
> > next point relase. 4.9.78 is just out but I'm unsure if we want to hold it
> > or
> > n
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 13:52 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> work on 4.9.77 is mostly done, so yes I'd like to push it to stretch before
> next point relase. 4.9.78 is just out but I'm unsure if we want to hold it or
> not.
Hi Ben,
So I went ahead an updated to 4.9.78 and added the revert for
Le 24 janv. 2018 14:07, "Yves-Alexis Perez" a écrit :
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 14:03 +0100, Julien Aubin wrote:
> I know it... :'( But as you rebuild the kernel image the updated compiler
> may come a bit later w/o needing another kernel update ?
I'm not really sure we will do a kernel binNMU in st
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 14:03 +0100, Julien Aubin wrote:
> I know it... :'( But as you rebuild the kernel image the updated compiler
> may come a bit later w/o needing another kernel update ?
I'm not really sure we will do a kernel binNMU in stretch-pu, but in any case
that's a discussion for when w
2018-01-24 13:52 GMT+01:00 Yves-Alexis Perez :
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 13:43 +0100, Julien Aubin wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-4.9.0-5-amd64
> > Version: 4.9.65-3+deb9u2
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: security
> > Justification: root security hole
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that kernel release 4.9
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 13:43 +0100, Julien Aubin wrote:
> Package: linux-image-4.9.0-5-amd64
> Version: 4.9.65-3+deb9u2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security
> Justification: root security hole
>
> Hi,
>
> Now that kernel release 4.9.77 has been released and contains the full
> retpoline fixes, cou
Package: linux-image-4.9.0-5-amd64
Version: 4.9.65-3+deb9u2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Hi,
Now that kernel release 4.9.77 has been released and contains the full
retpoline fixes, could you please bring it to stretch before the next p-u ?
I know this situat
13 matches
Mail list logo
