Bug#858084: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#858084: linux-image-amd64 - kernel option enable request)

2017-03-30 Thread Narayanan R S
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > AFAIK, there's no (performance or size) penalty in enabling it [...] > > It's not very large, but yes there is a cost. > > Is it enough to leave it disabled? It seems that being a (standard) sysfs interface, the penalty is not really muc

Bug#858084: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#858084: linux-image-amd64 - kernel option enable request)

2017-03-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 09:25 +0530, Narayanan R S wrote: > Hello, > > AFAIK, there's no (performance or size) penalty in enabling it [...] It's not very large, but yes there is a cost. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence. signature

Bug#858084: closed by Ben Hutchings (Re: Bug#858084: linux-image-amd64 - kernel option enable request)

2017-03-29 Thread Narayanan R S
ms > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Ben Hutchings > To: 858084-d...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:13:03 +0100 > Subject: Re: Bug#858084: linux-image-amd64 - kernel option enable request > On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 10:16 +0

Bug#858084: linux-image-amd64 - kernel option enable request

2017-03-17 Thread Narayanan R S
Package: linux-image-amd64 Version: 4.9+79~bpo8+1 Can you please enable the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS option for the kernels. Thanks in advance. Regards, Narayanan.