Bug#852194: make a /run/initramfs/messages

2017-01-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 07:58 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > BH> There is no log daemon for logger to talk to. > > Err... I mean talk to the same thing that is saving them up to put them > into journalctl. I think the only place available is the kernel log buffer. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Hoare's

Bug#852194: make a /run/initramfs/messages

2017-01-22 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
BH> There is no log daemon for logger to talk to. Err... I mean talk to the same thing that is saving them up to put them into journalctl.

Bug#852194: make a /run/initramfs/messages

2017-01-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 02:30 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote: > BH> initramfs-tools does not use systemd.  If systemd is failing to log its > BH>  output at boot time, that is not a bug in initramfs-tools. > > OK I filed #852229 [systemd] failing to log output at boot time > > BH> (I recognise that

Bug#852194: make a /run/initramfs/messages

2017-01-22 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
BH> initramfs-tools does not use systemd. If systemd is failing to log its BH> output at boot time, that is not a bug in initramfs-tools. OK I filed #852229 [systemd] failing to log output at boot time BH> (I recognise that initramfs-tools should log output before it hands BH> over to systemd (

Bug#852194: make a /run/initramfs/messages

2017-01-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2017-01-22 at 18:34 +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: initramfs-tools > Version: 0.126 > Severity: wishlist > > You generate > /run/initramfs/fsck-root > /run/initramfs/fsck.log > Good. > > Please also generate a similar log of the messages that the user sees > fly by upon boot before

Bug#852194: make a /run/initramfs/messages

2017-01-22 Thread Dan Jacobson
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.126 Severity: wishlist You generate /run/initramfs/fsck-root /run/initramfs/fsck.log Good. Please also generate a similar log of the messages that the user sees fly by upon boot before the ones that are captured by journalctl. Actually it turns out they are no