On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 06:58:46PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > IIRC Ben said that the next upstream kernel being tagged as LTS will be
> > the one included in Debian strech, so we’ll probably have 4.9… unless
> > Greg KH changes his mind again. :D
>
> Yes, exactly.
Thanks for clarifying.
T
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 13:44 +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:46:27AM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> > > > On 24 November 2016 at 01:34, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > >
> > > While the nftables package in Debian stretch will support notrack, the
> > > corresponding kerne
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:46:27AM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
On 24 November 2016 at 01:34, Peter Colberg wrote:
While the nftables package in Debian stretch will support notrack, the
corresponding kernel support was committed after the 4.9 merge window:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit
On 24 November 2016 at 01:34, Peter Colberg wrote:
>
> While the nftables package in Debian stretch will support notrack, the
> corresponding kernel support was committed after the 4.9 merge window:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/pablo/nf-next.git/commit/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c?id
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 01:55:01AM +0100, Jens Reyer wrote:
> According to
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/03/msg0.html it
> will be 4.10.
That would be great. After the recent announcement that 4.9 will
probably be the next LTS kernel I assumed that the same version
woul
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 07:34:42PM -0500, Peter Colberg wrote:
> Assuming 4.9 becomes the stretch kernel, could you backport the patch?
The same applies to kernel support for the "fib" expression that may
be used for reverse path filtering (analogous to iptables rp_filter).
https://git.kernel.org
On 24.11.2016 01:34, Peter Colberg wrote:
> Assuming 4.9 becomes the stretch kernel, could you backport the patch?
According to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/03/msg0.html it
will be 4.10.
Greets
jre
7 matches
Mail list logo
