On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:22:40AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It hit sid too. Our patch acceptance policy isn't quite as rigid as
> suggested. :-)
I see. Now all but Alpha are back at the same version. Nice to see.
--
Len Sorensen
On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 14:05 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:19:42PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >
> > On 05/05/2016 10:45 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I just verified that the patch provided fixes the problem as expected.
> > > I hav
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 11:19:42PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 10:45 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >> I just verified that the patch provided fixes the problem as expected.
> >
> > I have submitted it upstream.
>
> Great, that was quick.
>
> Please let me know in the
On 05/05/2016 10:45 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> I just verified that the patch provided fixes the problem as expected.
>
> I have submitted it upstream.
Great, that was quick.
Please let me know in the bug tracker when it has been merged upstream,
then Ben will be able to merge it in the Debi
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:26:18PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + patch
>
> On 05/05/2016 09:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >> If it works, I can submit it to the kernel. I don't have a powerpcspe
> >> environment to try building it, but I did notice that
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 05/05/2016 09:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> If it works, I can submit it to the kernel. I don't have a powerpcspe
>> environment to try building it, but I did notice that sstep.o contained
>> those two instructions when building a ppc32 kernel, and that's
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #823526 [src:linux] linux: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to the use of
unsupported instructions
Added tag(s) patch.
--
823526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 06:59:33PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Source: linux
> Version: 4.5.2-1
> Severity: normal
> User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: powerpcspe
>
> Hi!
>
> linux currently fails to build from source on powerpcspe since the compiler
> is using FPU in
On 05/05/2016 09:01 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> I think this would fix it:
> (...)
Good idea, I'll give that a try!
> It seems that gas on powerpc is willing to accept ldarx and stdcx even
> when compiling in 32 bit mode (even though the instructions are not
> allowed in 32 bit mode), while gas
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 06:59:33PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Source: linux
> Version: 4.5.2-1
> Severity: normal
> User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: powerpcspe
>
> Hi!
>
> linux currently fails to build from source on powerpcspe since the compiler
> is using FPU in
Sent from my iPhone
> On 05 May 2016, at 18:59, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>
> Source: linux
> Version: 4.5.2-1
> Severity: normal
> User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: powerpcspe
>
> Hi!
>
> linux currently fails to build from source on powerpcspe since the compiler
>
Source: linux
Version: 4.5.2-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: powerpcspe
Hi!
linux currently fails to build from source on powerpcspe since the compiler
is using FPU instructions which are not available on the e500v2 CPUs [1,2]:
{standard input}: Assembler messa
12 matches
Mail list logo
