On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 11:03 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Ben,
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2015 01:58:09 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Thanks for restoring support for 32-bit code generation. I recognise
> > it's not something you really want to support, so I'm leaving the kernel
> > bug open but changin
Ben,
On Tue, 26 May 2015 01:58:09 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
Thanks for restoring support for 32-bit code generation. I recognise
it's not something you really want to support, so I'm leaving the kernel
bug open but changing the title/severity accordingly.
This was fixed upstream starting at
Control: retitle -1 ppc64el kernel build requires multilib compiler
Control: severity -1 normal
Thanks for restoring support for 32-bit code generation. I recognise
it's not something you really want to support, so I'm leaving the kernel
bug open but changing the title/severity accordingly.
Ben.
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 ppc64el kernel build requires multilib compiler
Bug #785065 [src:linux] vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el
Changed Bug title to 'ppc64el kernel build requires multilib compiler' from
'vdso32 fails to built on ppc64el'
> severity -1 normal
Bug #785065 [src:l
On 2015-05-12 15:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never
> was a
> powerpcle userland support. If this is not possible in the short term, then we
> can re-enable this for unstable for some time.
>
This also seems to break grub2 on pp
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 18:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there
> > > never was a
> > > powerpcle userland suppo
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 17:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never
> > was a
> > powerpcle userland support.
>
> I agree we have no use for this code. Unfortunately it i
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never
> was a
> powerpcle userland support.
I agree we have no use for this code. Unfortunately it is currently
non-optional.
> If this is not possible in the short te
that should be fixed on the kernel side by removing this code. there never was a
powerpcle userland support. If this is not possible in the short term, then we
can re-enable this for unstable for some time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.0.2-1
Severity: serious
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S: Assembler messages:
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:42: Error: syntax
error; found `@', expected `,'
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso32/gettimeofday.S:42
10 matches
Mail list logo