On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Will custom kernels running on 486es still be supported, or is Debian
intending to desupport the 486 in userland as well?
They might still work. gcc is now configured to target 586 and above,
but I don't think there are any 586-only instructions that
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 upstream
Bug #766105 [linux] 486 kernel doesn't boot on net4501; CC_STACKPROTECTOR_NONE
helps
Added tag(s) upstream.
--
766105: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=766105
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 upstream
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 13:32 +0100, Ben Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > It appears that the stack protector depends on the TSC for
> > initialisation. This is not implemented by the Intel 486 or its clones.
>
> Oops. That suggests that th
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Ben Hutchings wrote:
It appears that the stack protector depends on the TSC for
initialisation. This is not implemented by the Intel 486 or its clones.
Oops. That suggests that there's an upstream problem as well, since the
kernel configuration system shouldn't allow yo
On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 22:21 +0100, Ben Harris wrote:
> Package: linux
> Version: 3.16.5-1
> Version: 3.16.3-2
> Version: 3.2.57-3
> Version: linux-2.6/2.6.31-1
> Severity: important
>
> Attempting to boot the kernel in linux-image-3.16-3-486 on a Soekris
> Engineering net4501 fails. With "consol
Package: linux
Version: 3.16.5-1
Version: 3.16.3-2
Version: 3.2.57-3
Version: linux-2.6/2.6.31-1
Severity: important
Attempting to boot the kernel in linux-image-3.16-3-486 on a Soekris
Engineering net4501 fails. With "console=ttyS0 earlyprintk=serial" on the
kernel command-line, I get the fol
6 matches
Mail list logo
