On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 17:38 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dixi quod…
>
> >Ben Hutchings dixit:
> >
> >>> One’s to add back CONFIG_BRK which is apparently needed to run a
> >>> popular ramdisk image used e.g. when testing the hardware or setting
> >>> up a completely new system.
> >>
> >>You mean
Dixi quod…
>Ben Hutchings dixit:
>
>>> One’s to add back CONFIG_BRK which is apparently needed to run a
>>> popular ramdisk image used e.g. when testing the hardware or setting
>>> up a completely new system.
>>
>>You mean CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK. I don't like this but I doubt anyone cares
>>to write e
Ben Hutchings dixit:
>> One’s to add back CONFIG_BRK which is apparently needed to run a
>> popular ramdisk image used e.g. when testing the hardware or setting
>> up a completely new system.
>
>You mean CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK. I don't like this but I doubt anyone cares
>to write exploits for m68k any
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #728392 [src:linux] linux: Please update m68k config
Added tag(s) pending.
--
728392: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728392
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Control: tag -1 pending
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 16:48 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Source: linux
> Version: 3.12~rc7-1~exp1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> please update the m68k kernel config; patch attached. The resulting
> image builds and boots on ARAnyM just fine, i.e. does
Source: linux
Version: 3.12~rc7-1~exp1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
please update the m68k kernel config; patch attached. The resulting
image builds and boots on ARAnyM just fine, i.e. does not regress.
One’s to add back FPU emulation, by very popular demand; apparently,
the Kconfig docs w
6 matches
Mail list logo
