Salvatore Bonaccorso :
> I'm closing this bug now as I think it's not anymore relevant in this
> outlined form. But please let me know if you disagree.
Why do you believe so? Did anything change, other than renaming
linux-tools to linu-perf?
On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 09:50 +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote:
> tags 711108 + patch
> thanks
>
> Untested patch attached.
>
> It may also be interesting to notice that apt already attempts to
> prevent automatic removal of linux-tools matching an installed kernel,
> but fails, since it assumes a vers
tags 711108 + patch
thanks
Untested patch attached.
It may also be interesting to notice that apt already attempts to
prevent automatic removal of linux-tools matching an installed kernel,
but fails, since it assumes a version format which is no longer in use:
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 711108 + patch
Bug #711108 [src:linux] linux-image-* should suggest linux-tools-*
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
711108: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It might be a useful hint. However the linux-tools meta-package is
> a more effective way to keep linux-tools-* up to date (unless you
> install the kernel from experimental).
Sure, I already use it, but, for an example, even though I do have the
kernel pointed at by linu
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:46:50PM +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote:
> Source: linux
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please consider having the linux-image-${version}-* packages suggesting
> the matching linux-tools-${version} package. This would help users to keep
> them in sync.
It might be a useful hint.
Source: linux
Severity: wishlist
Please consider having the linux-image-${version}-* packages suggesting
the matching linux-tools-${version} package. This would help users to keep
them in sync.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
7 matches
Mail list logo
