On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 14:55 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> This is looking good to me. On my test machine it makes tbf work correctly
> with gso packets.
> I worked on similar patch (enqueue path) myself some time ago but I got
> distracted by other tasks.
Yes, I understood this.
>
> Do you plan to
Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:03:10AM CEST, eric.duma...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:53 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 01:28 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > I'm seeing packet loss when forwarding from a LAN to PPP, whenever GRO
>> > kicks in on the LAN interface.
>> >
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:53 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 01:28 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I'm seeing packet loss when forwarding from a LAN to PPP, whenever GRO
> > kicks in on the LAN interface.
> >
> > On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 05:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [...]
>
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 01:28 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I'm seeing packet loss when forwarding from a LAN to PPP, whenever GRO
> kicks in on the LAN interface.
>
> On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 05:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [...]
> > The Windows system is connected to the LAN interface (int0). Tu
I'm seeing packet loss when forwarding from a LAN to PPP, whenever GRO
kicks in on the LAN interface.
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 05:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> The Windows system is connected to the LAN interface (int0). Turning
> off GRO on this interface works around the problem. But sin
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.41-2+deb7u2
Severity: normal
I attemped to update a Windows system yesterday, and after about a
minute it failed with a generic error code which MS suggests usually
indicates a firewall problem. I retried a few times, but with the
same result. All my firewall rule
6 matches
Mail list logo
