> I think Ben meant this one:
> http://codemonkey.org.uk/projects/trinity/
>
> Cheers,
> Balint
Thank you so much, Balint.
I will check the site. :)
Regards,
Hae-woo Park
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Hi,
On 09/22/2013 06:14 PM, Hae-woo Park wrote:
>
> Thank you so much for quick reply.
>
> I think you are absolutely right for Debian Stable.
> And I don't think I was right even in Debian Testing
> because I do not know what is done in the trinity test.
> I think I understand why the conservat
Thank you so much for quick reply.
I think you are absolutely right for Debian Stable.
And I don't think I was right even in Debian Testing
because I do not know what is done in the trinity test.
I think I understand why the conservative approach is needed.
I was merely curious about what makes t
On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 21:32 +0900, Hae-woo Park wrote:
>
> AFAIK, there are many x32 packages in amd64 repository.
>
> However, they are unusable due to that the kernel packages turned off
> the related option.
> Actually I do not know what the trinity test is; however,
> IMHO, the option could b
AFAIK, there are many x32 packages in amd64 repository.
However, they are unusable due to that the kernel packages turned off the
related option.
Actually I do not know what the trinity test is; however,
IMHO, the option could be turned on for user tests, at least on Jessie.
Is there any progress
5 matches
Mail list logo
