Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-24 Thread Georg Sassen
Hi, On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:39:27 + Ben Hutchings wrote: > > With the 3.8 kernel it works fine, the gma500_gfx module ist loaded > > and the native resolution of the display shown. > > Debian package or custom kernel? The one I tried was ii linux-image-3.8-trunk-686-pae 3.8-1~experimental

Processed: Re: Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #703506 [src:linux] GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 703506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703506 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUB

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 14:33 +0100, Georg Sassen wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > > Thanks for reporting. Can you reproduce this using > > xserver-xorg-video-modesetting and the 3.8.y kernel from experimental > > as well? > > With the 3.8 kernel it works fine, the gma500_gfx mo

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-22 Thread Georg Sassen
Quoting myself: Georg Sassen wrote: > It seems CONFIG_DRM_GMA500 (and maybe CONFIG_STUB_POULSBO) is not set > in the kernel config, so the gma500_gfx is not built at all, maybe > because of the name change from psb_gfx which was loaded with the > 3.2.35 kernel. > > I enabled the config options,

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:03:56 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> I know Alan takes reports through bugzilla.kernel.org > > Still? I thought that would have kinda stopped after > https://plus.google.com/04121194250082892/posts/KW3TdRYwjr9 You're right. I'm out of dat

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:03:56 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > I know Alan takes reports through bugzilla.kernel.org Still? I thought that would have kinda stopped after https://plus.google.com/04121194250082892/posts/KW3TdRYwjr9 Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signatu

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 22:58:41 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Jonathan Nieder wrote: >>> Georg Sassen wrote: While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution in X11 a

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 22:58:41 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi again, > > I left out the URL for Intel's bug reporting guidelines: > > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Georg Sassen wrote: > > >> While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel > >> version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-21 Thread Georg Sassen
Hi Jonathan, > Thanks for reporting. Can you reproduce this using > xserver-xorg-video-modesetting and the 3.8.y kernel from experimental > as well? With the 3.8 kernel it works fine, the gma500_gfx module ist loaded and the native resolution of the display shown. > I don't see your GPU driver

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi again, I left out the URL for Intel's bug reporting guidelines: Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Georg Sassen wrote: >> While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel >> version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution >> in X11 and the initial framebuffer now on

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Georg, Georg Sassen wrote: > While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel > version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution > in X11 and the initial framebuffer now on my Nokia Booklet 3G since > the update. Thanks for reporting. Can you reproduce this

Bug#703506: GMA500: higher resolutions than 800x600 don't work

2013-03-20 Thread Georg Sassen
Package: src:linux Version: 3.2.39-2 Severity: important While the native resolution (1280x720) worked fine until kernel version 3.2.0.4-686-pae_3.2.35-2, I now only have 800x600 resolution in X11 and the initial framebuffer now on my Nokia Booklet 3G since the update. -- Package-specific info