On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 11:56:00 -0500 (EST) Stephen Powell
wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 10:18:06 -0500 (EST), Gabriel Klawitter wrote:
> > Your patch will sort out cases like 08:02 but not the case where root
> > equals 'facade', 'added' or 'dead01'.
> > I'm using the root= parameter for giving the na
Stephen Powell schrieb am Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at
11:56:00AM -0500:
>
>We accept the following variants:
>
> 1) device number in hexadecimal represents itself
Hi Stephen,
I haven't read that kernel source code before and therefore didn't know that
the root parameter may be a hex numb
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 10:18:06 -0500 (EST), Gabriel Klawitter wrote:
>
> sorry for the ambiguity. I did't mean cases like 0x and 0x but
> the cases for which this function is being used. These are, as far as
> I've understood your post correctly, the case where root equals
> something like
On 12/31/2012 10:08 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> Try the following at a shell prompt:
>
>a=$((0x))
>echo $a
>a=$((0x))
>echo $a
>a=$((0xcompute))
>
> The first two assignment statements produce no errors, and the result
> of the echo command is 65535 in both cases,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:24:44 -0500 (EST), Gabriel Klawitter wrote:
>
> thank you for the efforts to solve the problem.
>
> Maybe I missed something, but isn't the case that is to be sorted out
> (for major/minors) the one that has a colon surrounded by digits (like
> [0-9]*:[0-9]*) and the case w
Hello,
thank you for the efforts to solve the problem.
Maybe I missed something, but isn't the case that is to be sorted out
(for major/minors) the one that has a colon surrounded by digits (like
[0-9]*:[0-9]*) and the case where the root string contains at most 4 hex
digits?
Why do not match
Jonathan,
After further study of your patch, I did notice one flaw: the pattern
"*[!A-Fa-f0-9]*" will not match the null string, as your comments suggest
it will. And you have deleted the separate case which handles the null
string. Here is an improved patch:
http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxm
7 matches
Mail list logo
