On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 12:21 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > > The package template system currently only supports one optional
> > > > > postinst action, but it wouldn't be hard to extend to
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 12:21 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > The package template system currently only supports one optional
> > > > postinst action, but it wouldn't be hard to extend to add others.
>
> Ok, I tried to ship the microcode
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > The package template system currently only supports one optional
> > > postinst action, but it wouldn't be hard to extend to add others.
Ok, I tried to ship the microcode for amd processors using firmware-nonfree.
There are a few problems:
1. firmwa
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 23:49 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 16:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > > On
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 23:49 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 16:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 15:08 -0300, Henrique de Moraes H
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 16:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 15:08 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > > They have to:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Issue sysfs commands
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 16:03 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 15:08 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > > > On 06/12/2012 06:04 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wr
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 15:08 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > > On 06/12/2012 06:04 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > > I don't care as long as nobody is going to get in the way of an
>
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 15:08 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > On 06/12/2012 06:04 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > I don't care as long as nobody is going to get in the way of an
> > > urgency=high upload of firmware-nonfree to st
sounds all very reasonable to me, thanks Henrique.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ.
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 06:04 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > I don't care as long as nobody is going to get in the way of an
> > urgency=high upload of firmware-nonfree to stable-proposed-updates or
> > stable-updates.
>
> there have been updates of f
On 06/12/2012 06:04 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I don't care as long as nobody is going to get in the way of an
> urgency=high upload of firmware-nonfree to stable-proposed-updates or
> stable-updates.
there have been updates of firmware-* packages in the past and more
recently for sq
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > so what is the point of adding it to firmware-nonfree?
>
> it would be nice to have everything in one place (= one src package),
> than to have things split over several, make the firmware stuff be
> updated all at once, and better integrated (by usin
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 08:34 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > On 06/10/2012 04:31 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > The microcode data file for Linux contains the latest microcode
> > > definitions
> > > for all AMD AMD64 processo
On 06/12/2012 01:34 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> However, amd64-microcode has a different upstream
iirc so do the different firmware parts that src:firmware-nonfree builds.
> and it would already
> have to generate a separate binary package anyway for license reasons,
iirc so are the
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 06/10/2012 04:31 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > The microcode data file for Linux contains the latest microcode definitions
> > for all AMD AMD64 processors.
>
> i'm aware that there's the intel-microcode package, however, why not
> integ
On 06/10/2012 04:31 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> The microcode data file for Linux contains the latest microcode definitions
> for all AMD AMD64 processors.
i'm aware that there's the intel-microcode package, however, why not
integrate this into firmware-nonfree (as firmware-amd-microc
17 matches
Mail list logo
