Bug#673391: Revised patches for be2net

2012-07-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
anks, > Sarvesh > > -Original Message- > From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:b...@decadent.org.uk] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:59 AM > To: Bandi,Sarveshwar > Cc: 673...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#673391: Revised patches for be2net > > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 0

Bug#673391: Revised patches for be2net

2012-07-09 Thread Sarveshwar.Bandi
,Sarveshwar Cc: 673...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#673391: Revised patches for be2net On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 06:45 -0700, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote: > Ben, > I am attaching the remaining to patches: > 68aad78 sweep the floors and convert some .get_drvinfo routines to > str

Bug#673391: Revised patches for be2net

2012-06-24 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 06:45 -0700, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote: > Ben, > I am attaching the remaining to patches: > 68aad78 sweep the floors and convert some .get_drvinfo routines to strlcpy > e5686ad netdev: make net_device_ops const > > Please apply them too. I don't see the point. Bu

Bug#673391: Revised patches for be2net

2012-05-31 Thread Sarveshwar.Bandi
, May 27, 2012 5:27 AM To: Bandi,Sarveshwar; 673...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#673391: Revised patches for be2net On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 09:30 -0700, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote: > Ben, > I am attaching the revised patches as per your comments. I was not > sure how to handl

Bug#673391: Revised patches for be2net

2012-05-26 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 09:30 -0700, sarveshwar.ba...@emulex.com wrote: > Ben, > I am attaching the revised patches as per your comments. I was not > sure how to handle patches (4 of them) which involved changes to other > drivers too. I intend to open separate bugs for each of them and send > them