Bug#660983: Licensed Symbol Conflicts with Some Non-GPL Modules

2012-03-03 Thread David Baron
On Friday 02 March 2012 15:38:05 Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > Most of the discussion of the -rt seems to be amount > > > > linux-audio-users and such. I am not in touch with NC or process > > > > control but these will want it also. I believe that they would also > > > > be involved with non-gpl so

Bug#660983: Licensed Symbol Conflicts with Some Non-GPL Modules

2012-03-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 11:53 +0200, David Baron wrote: > On Friday 02 March 2012 11:18:12 Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > David Baron wrote: > > > Most of the discussion of the -rt seems to be amount linux-audio-users > > > and such. I am not in touch with NC or process control but these will > > > want

Bug#660983: Licensed Symbol Conflicts with Some Non-GPL Modules

2012-03-02 Thread David Baron
On Friday 02 March 2012 11:18:12 Jonathan Nieder wrote: > David Baron wrote: > > Most of the discussion of the -rt seems to be amount linux-audio-users > > and such. I am not in touch with NC or process control but these will > > want it also. I believe that they would also be involved with non-gpl

Bug#660983: Licensed Symbol Conflicts with Some Non-GPL Modules

2012-03-02 Thread Jonathan Nieder
David Baron wrote: > Most of the discussion of the -rt seems to be amount linux-audio-users and > such. I am not in touch with NC or process control but these will want it > also. I believe that they would also be involved with non-gpl software. Sorry to have veered so far off-topic. I believe