On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 01:46:15AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Under discussion[1]. Not in drm-intel-next yet[2].
Sorry, I should have double checked my information.
> I suspect a different, more targetted patch[3] would do a better job
> of addressing the described use case:
I'm currently
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:24:54PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
>> With these patch it is possible to enable rc6 but not deep
>> or
>> deepest rc6, a setting that makes ultrabooks, well at least the ASUS Zenbook,
>> work very reliable but still get good ba
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 08:42:43PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> What is the upstream status of this?
AFAIK included in 3.4.
> Why is it important for the user to be able to configure this, i.e.
> why can't the kernel just DTRT? Why can't it be changed at run-time
> like CPU power-saving?
It is
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:24:54PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 3.2.6-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Eugeni Dodonov from Intel proposed a patch to make rc6 modes selectable via
> kernel parameter. With these patch it is possible to enable rc6 but not deep
> or
> deepes
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.6-1
Severity: wishlist
Eugeni Dodonov from Intel proposed a patch to make rc6 modes selectable via
kernel parameter. With these patch it is possible to enable rc6 but not deep or
deepest rc6, a setting that makes ultrabooks, well at least the ASUS Zenbook,
work very
5 matches
Mail list logo
