Hi,
On 05/10/2012 05:08 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I looked at the 2.6.32-44 kernel source to see if the simple fix
Trond suggested can be applied there as well, but I fail to find the
context where the extra line could be needed.
Here's a patch to try against 2.6.32.y.
Hope that helps,
Jona
Hi,
On 05/10/2012 02:56 PM, Rik Theys wrote:
So, the "Save owner/group name string" is the most efficient way of
ensuring that the open works as expected, and it should be a fairly
self-contained patch.
There is an alternative solution, which is much shorter (and therefore
appropriate for stabl
Hi Rik,
Rik Theys wrote:
> I looked at the 2.6.32-44 kernel source to see if the simple fix
> Trond suggested can be applied there as well, but I fail to find the
> context where the extra line could be needed.
Here's a patch to try against 2.6.32.y.
Hope that helps,
Jonathan
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.
Hi,
On 05/09/2012 04:34 PM, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
Can you please comment on wether additional fixes and/or
dependencies are needed to backport the patch below to the Debian
3.2 kernel?
So, the "Save owner/group name string" is the most efficient way of
ensuring that the open works as expect
Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> So, the "Save owner/group name string" is the most efficient way of
> ensuring that the open works as expected, and it should be a fairly
> self-contained patch.
>
> There is an alternative solution, which is much shorter (and therefore
> appropriate for stable kernels).
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 21:16 +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> Hi Trond,
> >>
> >> Can you please comment on wether additional fixes and/or
> >> dependencies are needed to backport the patch below to the Debian
> >> 3.2 kernel?
> >>
> >> The Debian ke
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Rik Theys wrote:
>> [21:08] I don't see any reply from Trond
>> [21:09] and I really do want to see that
>
> Ah, sounds like I misremembered the status. Thanks for clarifying.
>
> I do think that it would be nice to have a way to vet patches that
> does not involve wait
Rik Theys wrote:
> I asked Ben on IRC and he's still waiting on feedback from Trond first:
>
> [21:04] bwh: regarding bug 659111, Jonathan commented that "everything
>is in order". Did I miss a reply from Trond? Will the patch be
>applied to a future kernel update?
Hi,
On Tue, 8 May 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi Trond,
Can you please comment on wether additional fixes and/or
dependencies are needed to backport the patch below to the Debian
3.2 kernel?
The Debian kernel maintainers would prefer some feedback before
applying the fix to their 3.2 kernel.
Hi Rik,
Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi Trond,
>
> Can you please comment on wether additional fixes and/or
> dependencies are needed to backport the patch below to the Debian
> 3.2 kernel?
>
> The Debian kernel maintainers would prefer some feedback before
> applying the fix to their 3.2 kernel.
No, the
Hi Trond,
Can you please comment on wether additional fixes and/or dependencies
are needed to backport the patch below to the Debian 3.2 kernel?
The Debian kernel maintainers would prefer some feedback before applying
the fix to their 3.2 kernel.
Regards,
Rik
On 04/25/2012 03:14 AM, Ben H
Hi,
On 04/25/2012 03:14 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:04 +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing the bug described in the Debian[1] and Red Hat[2] bug tracker.
This bug seems to have been fixed in the 3.3 kernel with your commit
6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:04 +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing the bug described in the Debian[1] and Red Hat[2] bug
> tracker.
>
> This bug seems to have been fixed in the 3.3 kernel with your commit
> 6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b:
>
> From: Trond Myklebust
> Date
Greg KH wrote:
> This patch seems to violate Documentatin/stable_kernel_rules.txt,
> doesn't it?
If I remember correctly, it's possible to get it to about 300 lines
with context by backing out the internal API change and keeping an
extra, ignored argument to decode_getfattr() and decode_getfattr_
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing the bug described in the Debian[1] and Red Hat[2] bug
> tracker.
>
> This bug seems to have been fixed in the 3.3 kernel with your commit
> 6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b:
>
> From: Trond Myklebust
Hi,
I'm experiencing the bug described in the Debian[1] and Red Hat[2] bug tracker.
This bug seems to have been fixed in the 3.3 kernel with your commit
6926afd1925a54a13684ebe05987868890665e2b:
From: Trond Myklebust
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 13:22:46 -0500
Subject: NFSv4: Save the owner/group n
16 matches
Mail list logo
