Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-05-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Matthew, Matthew Ingersoll wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Thanks.  Sounds worth a try.  Please test the attached patch, for example >> following instructions from [1]. [...] > These are production systems and I do not have a spare NIC to test > with in th

Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-05-29 Thread Matthew Ingersoll
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > # fixed in 3.0.y. see also bug#663533 > tags 657689 + upstream patch moreinfo fixed-upstream > quit > > Matthew Ingersoll wrote: > > > Searching around, this may already be fixed elsewhere.  See the following > > reports: > > > > https:/

Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-05-29 Thread Jonathan Nieder
# fixed in 3.0.y. see also bug#663533 tags 657689 + upstream patch moreinfo fixed-upstream quit Matthew Ingersoll wrote: > Searching around, this may already be fixed elsewhere. See the following > reports: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785806 > > http://www.mail-archive.com/e1

Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-05-29 Thread Matthew Ingersoll
On two different machines running two different intel cards, I'm seeing a very similar issue. One machine has the Intel 82572EI and the other is 82571EB. After installing irqbalance on both machines, the messages have gone away for _only_ the 82571EB machine (before it was multiple times daily).

Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-02-26 Thread ubik pl
W dniu 28 stycznia 2012 23:04 użytkownik ubik pl napisał: > W dniu sobota, 28 stycznia 2012 użytkownik Ben Hutchings > napisał: > >> On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 09:56 +0100, ubik pl wrote: >>> 2012/1/28 Ben Hutchings : >>> > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 01:53 +0100, ubik pl wrote: >>> >> Package: linux-2.6 >>

Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-01-28 Thread ubik pl
W dniu sobota, 28 stycznia 2012 użytkownik Ben Hutchings < b...@decadent.org.uk> napisał: > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 09:56 +0100, ubik pl wrote: >> 2012/1/28 Ben Hutchings : >> > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 01:53 +0100, ubik pl wrote: >> >> Package: linux-2.6 >> >> Version: 2.6.32-38 >> >> Linux version 2.6

Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-01-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 09:56 +0100, ubik pl wrote: > 2012/1/28 Ben Hutchings : > > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 01:53 +0100, ubik pl wrote: > >> Package: linux-2.6 > >> Version: 2.6.32-38 > >> Linux version 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 > >> RAM 8GB > >> > >> Bug seems the same as #518182 and occurs on high traffic l

Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-01-28 Thread ubik pl
2012/1/28 Ben Hutchings : > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 01:53 +0100, ubik pl wrote: >> Package: linux-2.6 >> Version: 2.6.32-38 >> Linux version 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 >> RAM 8GB >> >> Bug seems the same as #518182 and occurs on high traffic load. >> System automatically recovered after aprox. 50 >> minutes(

Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-01-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 01:53 +0100, ubik pl wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-38 > Linux version 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 > RAM 8GB > > Bug seems the same as #518182 and occurs on high traffic load. > System automatically recovered after aprox. 50 > minutes([1782786.812335] e1000e :00:19.

Bug#657689: e1000e Detected Hardware Unit Hang:

2012-01-27 Thread ubik pl
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-38 Linux version 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 RAM 8GB Bug seems the same as #518182 and occurs on high traffic load. System automatically recovered after aprox. 50 minutes([1782786.812335] e1000e :00:19.0: eth0: Reset adapter) [1782779.812239] e1000e :00:19.0: et