Bug#657078: patches to reduce the footprint of the nfs4 idmapper

2012-04-25 Thread Jeff Layton
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:20:44 +0200 Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/24/2012 11:16 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:35:13 -0700 > > Greg KH wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug

Bug#657078: patches to reduce the footprint of the nfs4 idmapper

2012-04-25 Thread Rik Theys
Hi, On 04/24/2012 11:16 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:35:13 -0700 Greg KH wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote: Hi, I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on Debian. I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with t

Bug#657078: patches to reduce the footprint of the nfs4 idmapper

2012-04-25 Thread Rik Theys
Hi, On 04/24/2012 10:45 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Could you describe the problem in more detail? Under what circumstances does the idmapper provoke allocation failures, and how effectively do the patches avoid trouble? We have two big NFSv4 file servers that also automount from each other t

Bug#657078: patches to reduce the footprint of the nfs4 idmapper

2012-04-24 Thread Jeff Layton
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:35:13 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on > > Debian. > > > > I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches > > that reduce

Bug#657078: patches to reduce the footprint of the nfs4 idmapper

2012-04-24 Thread Jonathan Nieder
clone 657078 -1 retitle 657078 nfs: page allocation failure in nfs_idmap_new severity 657078 important tags 657078 + upstream patch quit Rik Theys wrote: > I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on > Debian. > > I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two pa

Bug#657078: patches to reduce the footprint of the nfs4 idmapper

2012-04-24 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:22:50PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on > Debian. > > I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches > that reduce the footprint of the nfs4 id mapper which should prevent > this (or

Bug#657078: patches to reduce the footprint of the nfs4 idmapper

2012-04-24 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Rik, Rik Theys wrote: > NFSv4: Further reduce the footprint of the idmapper > commit 685f50f9188ac1e8244d0340a9d6ea36b6136cec > > NFSv4: Reduce the footprint of the idmapper > commit d073e9b541e1ac3f52d72c3a153855d9a9ee3278 [...] > Have these patches made it into the 3.3 and/or 3.4-rc kernels?

Bug#657078: patches to reduce the footprint of the nfs4 idmapper

2012-04-24 Thread Rik Theys
Hi, I'm experiencing the following Red Hat bug[1] on RHEL and also on Debian. I've noticed Fedora has started to ship an update with two patches that reduce the footprint of the nfs4 id mapper which should prevent this (or seriously limit the chance). NFSv4: Further reduce the footprint of the