Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 05:40:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> To avoid confusion when people misfile bugs about a source package,
>> it seems that the BTS invents a fake binary package for any
>> source package .
>
> From where do you get that that is actually supported
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 05:40:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> >>> Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
> >>> Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
> >>> instead of the current:
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>> Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
>>> Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
>>> instead of the current:
>>> Submit-As: linux-2.6
>>
>> What would be the benefit?
>
> That it's filed a
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> severity 644198 wishlist
> found 644198 linux-2.6/3.2.10-1
> tags 644198 + moreinfo
> quit
>
> Hi,
>
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
> > Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
> > instead of the cur
severity 644198 wishlist
found 644198 linux-2.6/3.2.10-1
tags 644198 + moreinfo
quit
Hi,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
> Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
> instead of the current:
> Submit-As: linux-2.6
What would be the benefit? Any downsides?
Curious,
Jonath
Package: src:linux-2.6
Hi,
Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
instead of the current:
Submit-As: linux-2.6
That way the BTS will properly know this is a bug against a source
package and not a binary package.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-k
6 matches
Mail list logo
