Hi,
After having a look to the contents of initrd.img-3.0.0-2-mckinley and
of initrd.img-2.6.32-5-mckinley, I have notice some points about the
first
one that don't boot.
It confirms that busybox is missing even if the included
conf/initramfs.conf
says BUSYBOX=y.
Also it appears to have a mu
Hi,
> does initramfs-tools boot with BUSYBOX=no in initramfs.conf?
Well, I don't know! Indeed, with BUSYBOX=no in initramfs.conf,
initrd.img generation fails:
root@longspeak:/# dpkg-reconfigure linux-image-3.0.0-1-mckinley
Running depmod.
Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d.
run-parts: executing /et
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:18:38AM +0200, Émeric Maschino wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.99
> Severity: grave
>
> As stated in this thread
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2011/08/msg1.html, Debian
> "Wheezy" Testing cannot be booted at all on IA-64 (current
> linux-image-
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.99
Severity: grave
As stated in this thread
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2011/08/msg1.html, Debian
"Wheezy" Testing cannot be booted at all on IA-64 (current
linux-image-3.0.0-1-mckinley in Testing depends on initramfs-tools
0.99, so initramfs-tools c
4 matches
Mail list logo