Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I've been running a 2.6.32-41 kernel with those patches for 8 days, but
> all I can say is that I haven't noticed any *new* issues.
>
> My USB-attached APC UPS is working exactly as before, although still
> affected by #409349 (control queue full).
>
> I have never expe
On 04/04/12 23:00, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> While I have your attention: does the patch series in #631287 seem to
> prevent the BUG as advertised without any noticeable unpleasant
> side-effects? How long have you been testing it?
I've been running a 2.6.32-41 kernel with those patches for 8 days
>>
>>I already prepared the installation of 3.2.x from squeeze-backports but I
>> have still to boot that kernel:
>
>Thanks! I look forward to hearing the result.
Problem is gone with
server:~# uname -a
Linux server 3.2.0-0.bpo.1-486 #1 Thu Jan 26 00:51:35 UTC 2012 i686
GNU/Linux
--
To UNS
Am 11.02.12 12:31 schrieb "Steven Chamberlain" unter :
>Hi!
>
>On 11/02/12 11:00, Joachim Oehler wrote:
>> # uname -a
>> Linux server 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Mon Jun 13 04:13:06 UTC 2011 i686
>> GNU/Linux
>
>To get the Debian kernel package version please use:
>$ cat /proc/version
>
>From the build d
found 631287 linux-2.6/2.6.32-35
quit
Hi Joachim,
Joachim Oehler wrote:
> We're also currently encountering this particular bug, find dmesg output
> below.
> The kernel currently installed is:
>
> # uname -a
> Linux server 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Mon Jun 13 04:13:06 UTC 2011 i686
> GNU/Linux
[...]
>
Hi!
On 11/02/12 11:00, Joachim Oehler wrote:
> # uname -a
> Linux server 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Mon Jun 13 04:13:06 UTC 2011 i686
> GNU/Linux
To get the Debian kernel package version please use:
$ cat /proc/version
>From the build date (Jun 13) I would think you were running 2.6.32-35;
this is quit
Hi Stefan et al,
I'd like to ask a favor. The following kernel bug is stalled for lack
of access to a USB APC UPS. Do you know of anyone who could reproduce
it and confirm the fix?
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote[1]:
> After upgrading to squeeze I've started receiving the following BUG in dmesg
Hello, colleagues,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:24 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>
>>> After upgrading to squeeze I've started receiving the following BUG in dmesg
>>> when apcupsd tries to access hid device fo
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:24 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> After upgrading to squeeze I've started receiving the following BUG in dmesg
>> when apcupsd tries to access hid device for my UPS (APC SmartUPS 3000,
>> connected via USB).
> [...]
>
> There have been some
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 19:24 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem
> Version: 2.6.32-34squeeze1
> Severity: important
>
> After upgrading to squeeze I've started receiving the following BUG in dmesg
> when apcupsd tries to access hid device for my UPS (APC
10 matches
Mail list logo
