On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 26, rleigh wrote:
>
> > Testing with initramfs-tools (maks/run) with current unstable shows
> > udev appearing to work correctly with it using /dev/.udev when /run
> > is not present on the host system. And also with /run pre
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:48:15PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 26, rleigh wrote:
>
> > Testing with initramfs-tools (maks/run) with current unstable shows
> > udev appearing to work correctly with it using /dev/.udev when /run
> > is not present on the host system. And also with /run pre
On Apr 26, rleigh wrote:
> Testing with initramfs-tools (maks/run) with current unstable shows
> udev appearing to work correctly with it using /dev/.udev when /run
> is not present on the host system. And also with /run present on
Did you check with LVM and that all its persistent symlinks are
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:12:49PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 26, rleigh wrote:
>
> > > -mount -t tmpfs -o nodev,noexec,nosuid,mode=0755 none /run
> > > +mount -t tmpfs -o "nosuid,size=20%,mode=0755" tmpfs /run
> Why does /run should not be noexec?
If /run/shm is also on /run (not a sep
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> block 623174 by 621803
> thanks
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 08:14:47PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:38:41PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > By the way, could you consider adding this patch to your branch:
>
On Apr 26, rleigh wrote:
> > -mount -t tmpfs -o nodev,noexec,nosuid,mode=0755 none /run
> > +mount -t tmpfs -o "nosuid,size=20%,mode=0755" tmpfs /run
Why does /run should not be noexec?
> I've added the block above because we can't make an upload of sysvinit/
> initscripts to unstable until we h
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 623174 by 621803
Bug #623174 [initscripts] /run must exist in the initramfs and be moved to the
root filesystem
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 623174: 621803
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
block 623174 by 621803
thanks
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 08:14:47PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:38:41PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > By the way, could you consider adding this patch to your branch:
>
> diff --git a/init b/init
> index 38c8a5d..cdbfe50 100755
> --- a/init
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:38:41PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:58:07PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:43:02PM +0100, rleigh wrote:
> > >
> > > I didn't see a patch in git, so I've attached a simple one here.
> > > This creates /run as a tm
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:58:07PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:43:02PM +0100, rleigh wrote:
> >
> > I didn't see a patch in git, so I've attached a simple one here.
> > This creates /run as a tmpfs, and moves the mount to the rootfs
> > /run as done for other files
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:43:02PM +0100, rleigh wrote:
> severity 621803 important
> tags 621803 + patch
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 03:08:37AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Package: initramfs-tools
> > Version: 0.98.8+45+g08fbe1e-1
> > Severity: normal
> > User: rle...@debian.org
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 621803 important
Bug #621803 [initramfs-tools] Add support for /run directory
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> tags 621803 + patch
Bug #621803 [initramfs-tools] Add support for /run directory
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopp
severity 621803 important
tags 621803 + patch
thanks
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 03:08:37AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.98.8+45+g08fbe1e-1
> Severity: normal
> User: rle...@debian.org
> Usertags: run-transition
>
> Hi maks,
>
> we already talked about this and
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.8+45+g08fbe1e-1
Severity: normal
User: rle...@debian.org
Usertags: run-transition
Hi maks,
we already talked about this and you already started implementing /run
support in initramfs-tools [1], so this is merely a bug to keep track
of this transition [2].
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
