Bug#620535: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Suspend to disk does not work anymore

2011-04-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 17:41 +0200, Andreas Wirooks wrote: > Thank you for ansering, but the free radeon driver has the same effect. > I forgot two things to to tell in my report. First, i already tried > without fglrx. Second, suspend to ram is not affected - only suspend to > disk. We have anothe

Bug#620535: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Suspend to disk does not work anymore

2011-04-02 Thread Andreas Wirooks
Thank you for ansering, but the free radeon driver has the same effect. I forgot two things to to tell in my report. First, i already tried without fglrx. Second, suspend to ram is not affected - only suspend to disk. Regards, Andreas P.S. Sorry for sending RichText first (i hope it was filtered

Bug#620535: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Suspend to disk does not work anymore

2011-04-02 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 15:54 +0200, Andreas Wirooks wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-32 > Severity: important > > Resume leads to a total crash. In the log's i found the following in messages: > [0.00] PM: Registered nosave memory: 0009f000 - > 000a > [0

Bug#620535: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Suspend to disk does not work anymore

2011-04-02 Thread Andreas Wirooks
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-32 Severity: important Resume leads to a total crash. In the log's i found the following in messages: [0.00] PM: Registered nosave memory: 0009f000 - 000a [0.00] PM: Registered nosave memory: 000a - 000e