On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 02:51 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:05 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
..
> > Where can I report upstream?
>
> You already did (alsa-de...@alsa-project.org) and you were requested to
> do a bisection between Linux 2.6.32 and 2.6.37.
>
> You can find bin
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:05 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> found 619034 2.6.37-1
> found 619034 2.6.38-1
> found 619034 2.6.38-2
> found 619034 2.6.39-1
> found 619034 2.6.39-2
> thanks
>
> Anybody looking into this bug?? I still have to use the 2.6.32-5-amd64
> kernel due to this problem. Looks
found 619034 2.6.37-1
found 619034 2.6.38-1
found 619034 2.6.38-2
found 619034 2.6.39-1
found 619034 2.6.39-2
thanks
Anybody looking into this bug?? I still have to use the 2.6.32-5-amd64
kernel due to this problem. Looks like 2.6.32 complains about an address
space conflict, but at least it boot
3 matches
Mail list logo