ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:
> We never supported oot binary crap, nor do we intend to do.
> closing, as you already got all the explanations.
For the record, VMware modules come as source.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer -
Public key avai
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Hi,
>> Good luck with that, it's been tried already with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
>> and people still do work around that.
>
> That is probably copyright infringement.
Maybe, maybe not. Nobody actually really knows.
> It sounds like you should really be using ESX/vSphere on the
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 18:23 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> >> This is reinforced by reading the packaging scripts and realizing they
> >> check the whole ABI, prior to -28.
> >
> > This is not correct. We have ignored many changes since 2.6.32-12 when
> > the
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 06:23:20PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is not correct. We have ignored many changes since 2.6.32-12 when
> > the ABI number was bumped to 5. In 2.6.32-27 the symbol version files
> > were refreshed and the ignore list was reset.
> This is e
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Hi Ben,
>> This is reinforced by reading the packaging scripts and realizing they
>> check the whole ABI, prior to -28.
>
> This is not correct. We have ignored many changes since 2.6.32-12 when
> the ABI number was bumped to 5. In 2.6.32-27 the symbol version files
> were
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 16:20 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Some distributions provide a list all exported symbols which can be
> > depended on not to change. We haven't done that but we do consider
>
> What you're saying here is very important: you haven't don
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Hi,
> Some distributions provide a list all exported symbols which can be
> depended on not to change. We haven't done that but we do consider
What you're saying here is very important: you haven't done that yet,
which implies that all symbols are covered by the ABI.
This
On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 09:26 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> reopen 607368
> submitter 607368 !
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I am sorry that I have to reopen this bug, but first this is about more
> than just smp_ops and second the outcome isn't satisfactory.
>
> Whether a symbol is exported for a specific
reopen 607368
submitter 607368 !
thanks
Hi,
I am sorry that I have to reopen this bug, but first this is about more
than just smp_ops and second the outcome isn't satisfactory.
Whether a symbol is exported for a specific purpose or for general
usage, whether you like it or not, every symbol that
9 matches
Mail list logo
