Bug#600204: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image

2012-02-17 Thread Jonathan Nieder
(cc-ing the grub maintainers. grub maintainers, see (*) below) Hi again, Philip Ashmore wrote: > On 03/09/11 20:13, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Philip Ashmore wrote: >> Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:34:11PM +0100, Philip Ashmore wrote: I hibernated in Lenny,

Bug#600204: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image

2011-09-03 Thread Philip Ashmore
On 03/09/11 20:13, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi Philip, Philip Ashmore wrote: The Debian kernel has to decide if the image signature is a match - that's the reason for this bug report. IMHO the release name or equivalent should be in that signature somewhere, unless you're saying that their init

Bug#600204: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image

2011-09-03 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Philip, Philip Ashmore wrote: > The Debian kernel has to decide if the image signature is a match > - that's the reason for this bug report. > > IMHO the release name or equivalent should be in that signature > somewhere, unless you're saying that their initrd's are a match too. The initrds

Bug#600204: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image

2010-10-17 Thread Philip Ashmore
Ben Hutchings wrote: Not that I'm aware of. Hibernation images are actually encoded and decoded entirely by the kernel, by default. Are you using uswsusp? Ben. The Debian kernel has to decide if the image signature is a match - that's the reason for this bug report. IMHO the release name or

Bug#600204: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image

2010-10-17 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 21:10 +0100, Philip Ashmore wrote: > Did I mention that Lenny is using 2.6.32-5-amd64 from Squeeze? > > The initrd images were generated by Lenny and Squeeze separately even > though they are the same version and I have separate entries in > grub.cfg for each. OK, understoo

Bug#600204: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image

2010-10-17 Thread Philip Ashmore
Did I mention that Lenny is using 2.6.32-5-amd64 from Squeeze? The initrd images were generated by Lenny and Squeeze separately even though they are the same version and I have separate entries in grub.cfg for each. The reason I thought this worth reporting is that I also made the same mistake

Bug#600204: Processed: Re: Bug#600204: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image

2010-10-14 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 21:39 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > reopen 600204 > Bug #600204 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] > linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image > > thanks > Stopping processing here.

Processed: Re: Bug#600204: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image

2010-10-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 600204 Bug #600204 {Done: Ben Hutchings } [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 600204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Bug#600204: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Squeeze ignores Lennys hibernate image

2010-10-14 Thread Philip Ashmore
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-23 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss I hibernated in Lenny, using the same kernel version. The next day I accidentally selected Squeeze from the grub2 menu. Squeeze started up normally and reported on filesystems not cleanly closed and o