Bug#599345: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: iwlagn allocation failure

2010-12-21 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:30 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:17 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Getting lots of those in dmesg: > > iwlagn :0c:00.0: Too many chunks: 2 > > > > Doesn't seem to prevent the network from working though. > > It'll at least leak lots of me

Bug#599345: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: iwlagn allocation failure

2010-12-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 22:54:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 21:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Version: 2.6.32-23 > > Severity: normal > > > > iwlagn decided 2 weeks of uptime was enough and it wanted me to reboot, > > because it was unhappy aft

Bug#599345: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: iwlagn allocation failure

2010-10-13 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:17 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Getting lots of those in dmesg: > iwlagn :0c:00.0: Too many chunks: 2 > > Doesn't seem to prevent the network from working though. It'll at least leak lots of memory though. But I think the check there is just wrong -- there are TFDs

Bug#599345: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: iwlagn allocation failure

2010-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 20:03:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 09:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:54 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 21:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > Package: linux-2.6 > > > > Version: 2.6.32-23 >

Bug#599345: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: iwlagn allocation failure

2010-10-10 Thread Johannes Berg
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 20:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I have, however much more recently than that kernel, cleaned this up in > > commit ff0d91c3eea6e25b47258349b455671f98f1b0cd -- this particular > > allocation is now 2048 or 4096 bytes depending on the architecture (32 > > vs 64 bit pointe

Bug#599345: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: iwlagn allocation failure

2010-10-10 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 09:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:54 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 21:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Package: linux-2.6 > > > Version: 2.6.32-23 > > > > Oct 6 21:05:02 radis kernel: [378665.326381] NetworkManager: pag

Bug#599345: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: iwlagn allocation failure

2010-10-07 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 22:54 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 21:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Version: 2.6.32-23 > > Oct 6 21:05:02 radis kernel: [378665.326381] NetworkManager: page > > allocation failure. order:4, mode:0x40d0 > > Oct 6 21:05:02

Bug#599345: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: iwlagn allocation failure

2010-10-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 21:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-23 > Severity: normal > > iwlagn decided 2 weeks of uptime was enough and it wanted me to reboot, > because it was unhappy after resume. You also told me that this machine had no swap enabled, which is

Bug#599345: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: iwlagn allocation failure

2010-10-06 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-23 Severity: normal iwlagn decided 2 weeks of uptime was enough and it wanted me to reboot, because it was unhappy after resume. Bit of kern.log: Oct 6 21:05:02 radis kernel: [378665.326381] NetworkManager: page allocation failure. order:4, mode:0x40d0 Oct 6