On Thursday 18 July 2013 20:28:20 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Wheezy uses a different driver (rt2800pci instead of rt2860sta).
> Raphael wrote "Indeed, the rt2800 driver works like a charm compared
> to the rt2860sta" (2012-01-19). I consider that good enough. ;-)
Ack., and apologies for not testing
Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:57:24AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> It's not serious enough to fix in oldstable. Thanks for asking.
>
> Of course it wouldn't warrant a fix in oldstable, but I don't see any
> confirmation that this is fixed in Wheezy? That's why I asked.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:57:24AM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:23:31AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> On 27 November 2011 01:09, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >>> Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> I just tried with a visible AP
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:23:31AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On 27 November 2011 01:09, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> I just tried with a visible AP (using the same crypto settings) and it
> >> works.
> >> So, the changes to the module appear to
Hi Jonathan,
On 27 November 2011 01:09, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> I just tried with a visible AP (using the same crypto settings) and it works.
>> So, the changes to the module appear to only break support for hidden APs.
>
> Thanks for finding this. As Ben mentioned, R
tags 593183 + moreinfo
quit
Hi,
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> I just tried with a visible AP (using the same crypto settings) and it works.
>> So, the changes to the module appear to only break support for hidden APs.
[...]
> 1. Just to check, can you still reproduce the t
Hi Raphael,
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> I just tried with a visible AP (using the same crypto settings) and it works.
> So, the changes to the module appear to only break support for hidden APs.
Thanks for finding this. As Ben mentioned, Realtek's original
rt2860sta driver was abandoned in favor
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 14:18 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Sunday 05 September 2010 10:09:30 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 September 2010 05:53:03 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > AFAIK rt2860sta has never worked with hidden APs.
> >
> > It has and it does with wpasupplicant, until I upg
On Sunday 05 September 2010 10:09:30 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Sunday 05 September 2010 05:53:03 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > AFAIK rt2860sta has never worked with hidden APs.
>
> It has and it does with wpasupplicant, until I upgrade to src:2.6.32-18 or
> greater. I can try to test with one that i
On Sunday 05 September 2010 05:53:03 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 22:49 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've no longer had any problem with 2.6.32-5-686 and WEP-protected and
> > similar APs. The only AP I'm still unable to connect to with -5 is a
> > hidden WPA2-PSK
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 22:49 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've no longer had any problem with 2.6.32-5-686 and WEP-protected and
> similar APs. The only AP I'm still unable to connect to with -5 is a
> hidden WPA2-PSK-CCMP AP.
> I tried to take a look at the changes made in src:2.6.32-1
Hi,
I've no longer had any problem with 2.6.32-5-686 and WEP-protected and
similar APs. The only AP I'm still unable to connect to with -5 is a
hidden WPA2-PSK-CCMP AP.
I tried to take a look at the changes made in src:2.6.32-18 but the
patch is too "intrusive."
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Deb
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-18
Severity: important
Hi,
Upgrading to 2.6.32-18 more or less breaks support for the RaLink
RT2860: wpasupplicant no longer works very well, I've seen it
not even try to associate to encryption-less APs, not displaying the
list of really available APs (especia
13 matches
Mail list logo
