On Tue, 15, Jun, 2010 at 01:27:19PM +0100, Ben Hutchings spoke thus..
> I understood that, but wanted to check that there was not a semantic
> difference between 2.6.32 and .35 that made the former correct.
> However, now that I've looked more closely I think this change is valid
> for both version
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 08:54 +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Tue, 15, Jun, 2010 at 01:44:45AM +0100, Ben Hutchings spoke thus..
[...]
> > > tty = tty_port_tty_get(&port->port);
> > > if (urb->actual_length) {
> > > - tty_buffer_request_room(tty, urb->actual_length)
Mark Hymers writes:
> On Tue, 15, Jun, 2010 at 01:44:45AM +0100, Ben Hutchings spoke thus..
>
>> > @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@
>> >for (i = 0; i < serial->num_ports; i++) {
>> >port = serial->port[i];
>> >if (!port->interrupt_in_urb) {
>> > - dbg("%s: No interr
On Tue, 15, Jun, 2010 at 01:44:45AM +0100, Ben Hutchings spoke thus..
> > diff -u source/drivers/usb/serial/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/serial/Kconfig
> > --- source/drivers/usb/serial/Kconfig 2010-06-11 21:50:52.087338327
> > +0100
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/Kconfig
> > @@ -474,6 +474,7 @@
> >
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 14:15 +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Sun, 13, Jun, 2010 at 03:33:43AM +0100, Ben Hutchings spoke thus..
> > I would prefer if you could provide one patch corresponding to each of
> > the upstream commits, for 2.6.32. This makes it easier to compare
> > versions and to resolve
On Sun, 13, Jun, 2010 at 03:33:43AM +0100, Ben Hutchings spoke thus..
> I would prefer if you could provide one patch corresponding to each of
> the upstream commits, for 2.6.32. This makes it easier to compare
> versions and to resolve any future conflicts with stable updates.
Ok. I've attached
On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 22:31 +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-15
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to have the patches for Qualcomm Gobi 2000 USB WWAN
> support merged in both 2.6.32 and 2.6.34? The patch breaks out code from the
>
7 matches
Mail list logo
