On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 07:13:03AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings
> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:59:20 +
>
> > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 10:19 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Fortunately David Miller came to the rescue and personally debugged the
> >> problem on one of the
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:59:20 +
> On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 10:19 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> [...]
>> Fortunately David Miller came to the rescue and personally debugged the
>> problem on one of the buildds, and fixed the problem. His solution, that
>> we are currently runn
* Ben Hutchings [2010-03-04 14:59]:
> > Please include the patch in the sparc kernel package so that we can test
> > it widely, preferably ASAP. TIA.
>
> This is not applicable to 2.6.32 as the spinlock API has changed. I
> assume David will send a suitable patch to stable shortly, and we'll use
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 10:19 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
[...]
> Fortunately David Miller came to the rescue and personally debugged the
> problem on one of the buildds, and fixed the problem. His solution, that
> we are currently running on schroeder.debian.org, is attached.
>
> Please include the p
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch
Hi there,
Ever since kernel 2.6.29 came out, several classes of sparc machines have
been unable to upgrade, because they would get stuck while initializing
the new NMI watchdog code.
The process of trying to figure it out is mostly docume
5 matches
Mail list logo
