On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:04:19PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > > As this does not boot, I tried again a new installation, and forced to
> > > add ide_generic to the initrd, and that works! The machine boots fin
Hi,
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Holger Wansing wrote:
> > As this does not boot, I tried again a new installation, and forced to
> > add ide_generic to the initrd, and that works! The machine boots fine
> > with ide_generic.
> > But as this is an obsolete driver, you may not b
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> As this does not boot, I tried again a new installation, and forced to
> add ide_generic to the initrd, and that works! The machine boots fine
> with ide_generic.
> But as this is an obsolete driver, you may not be interested in info
> about this.
I
Hello,
maximilian attems wrote:
> hmm so the ata generic driver might have a bug to not properly
> show up in /sys and thus not to land on initramfs.
>
>
>
> > I know, that in the past, the module ide_generic was needed for
> > this machine to access the harddisc.
>
> so to boot it I would
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Holger Wansing wrote:
> t...@debian:~/Desktop/571035$ lsinitramfs initrd-in-question | grep modules
> conf/modules
> lib/modules
> lib/modules/2.6.32-5-486
> lib/modules/2.6.32-5-486/kernel
> lib/modules/2.6.32-5-486/kernel/fs
> lib/modules/2.6.32-5-486/kernel/fs/mbcache.ko
>
Hello,
maximilian attems wrote:
> oh sorry got confused by all that.
> could you post the content of the initramfs in question?
>
> lsinitramfs /boot/initramfs-2.6.32-5-486 | grep modules
t...@debian:~/Desktop/571035$ lsinitramfs initrd-in-question | grep modules
conf/modules
lib/modules
lib/m
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:41:30PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Oh, you are right of course, my initial report was for alpha1.
> Otavio has already prompted me to retry with an recent built, what
> I did:
>
> I used a daily built from 23. Aug 2010.
> See the results on
>
> http://bugs.debian
Hello,
maximilian attems wrote:
> your subject tells alpha1 squeeze built, those are in fact quite old,
> please try with a "proper" daily built.
>
Oh, you are right of course, my initial report was for alpha1.
Otavio has already prompted me to retry with an recent built, what
I did:
I used a
8 matches
Mail list logo