Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG at kernel/exit.c:822! PATCHES

2010-06-29 Thread Georg Borgström
On 29 Jun 2010, be...@elbournb.fsnet.co.uk wrote: [ SNIP ] > I really would be happier if there were no root setuid involved in a > browser. Also I am not sure there is enough demand here to warrant a > change to the production Debian kernels. > > Much as it hurts: The answer for me, at least unt

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG at kernel/exit.c:822!

2010-06-29 Thread Berni Elbourn
Just a snippet on the Google Sandbox. From here: http://blog.chromium.org/2008/10/new-approach-to-browser-security-google.html "The entire HTML rendering and JavaScript execution is isolated to its own class of processes; the renderers. These are the ones that live in the sandbox." ...perhap

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG at kernel/exit.c:822! PATCHES

2010-06-29 Thread Berni Elbourn
The "bug" is still present in Google Chrome Stable version: 5.0.375.86 Ben Hutchings wrote: I think we should actually apply a second patch. So, please try the two attached patches Please test this fix by following the instructions at http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG

2010-04-03 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 16:05 +0100, Georg Borgström wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to disable the "sandbox" mentioned in > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35440 by adding the > switch --no-sandbox to google-chrome and the problem went away! > > With the switch I don't get "Not cloning

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG

2010-03-18 Thread Georg Borgström
On 18 Mar 2010, b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: >On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:05:57PM +0100, Georg Borgström wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to disable the "sandbox" mentioned in >> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35440 by adding the >> switch --no-sandbox to google-chrome and the proble

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG

2010-03-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 04:05:57PM +0100, Georg Borgström wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to disable the "sandbox" mentioned in > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35440 by adding the > switch --no-sandbox to google-chrome and the problem went away! > > With the switch I don't get "Not

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG

2010-03-18 Thread Georg Borgström
Hi, I tried to disable the "sandbox" mentioned in http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=35440 by adding the switch --no-sandbox to google-chrome and the problem went away! With the switch I don't get "Not cloning cgroup for unused subsystem ns" when starting chrome and no ugly "crash

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG at kernel/exit.c:822!

2010-02-27 Thread Berni Elbourn
Ben Hutchings wrote: There are some questions on the Chrome/Chromium bug report . Could you please have a look and try to answer them? Chrome duly bug updated. I was able to do quite a lot of chrome browsing including flash without pr

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG at kernel/exit.c:822!

2010-02-27 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 02:33 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:33 +, Berni Elbourn wrote: > > Package: linux-2.6 > > Version: 2.6.26-21lenny3 > > Severity: normal > > > > > > This may relate to #542115. This system kernel is new (HP ML115) and > > most definitely not taint

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG at kernel/exit.c:822!

2010-02-22 Thread Berni Elbourn
Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:33 +, Berni Elbourn wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-21lenny3 Severity: normal This may relate to #542115. This system kernel is new (HP ML115) and most definitely not tainted with ndiswrappers or nvidia. I am logging the report just p

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG at kernel/exit.c:822!

2010-02-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:33 +, Berni Elbourn wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.26-21lenny3 > Severity: normal > > > This may relate to #542115. This system kernel is new (HP ML115) and > most definitely not tainted with ndiswrappers or nvidia. I am logging > the report just prior to

Bug#570350: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: kernel BUG at kernel/exit.c:822!

2010-02-18 Thread Berni Elbourn
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.26-21lenny3 Severity: normal This may relate to #542115. This system kernel is new (HP ML115) and most definitely not tainted with ndiswrappers or nvidia. I am logging the report just prior to repooting. System seems stable enough. This could be pretty grim for