Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben, > ... the date headers in linux-2.6 have not been updated ... I only "whinged" about headers; content in 2.6.26-21 is also in fact older than kernel-package. I do not know what you may have changed for bleeding-edge 2.6.32; and of course I want Debian stable to be updated (now or in the

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 09:01 +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: > Dear Maks, > > > ... saw your old patch and can do that later tomorrow. > > Thanks. Please also fix current Debian stable, do not make us wait until > 2.6.32 trickles down. > > >> Should this bug somehow be "given" to kernel-pa

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Maks, > ... saw your old patch and can do that later tomorrow. Thanks. Please also fix current Debian stable, do not make us wait until 2.6.32 trickles down. >> Should this bug somehow be "given" to kernel-package also (clone and >> reassign?): would you be able to do that? > don't know ker

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread maximilian attems
Dear Paul, On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 10:02:47PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: > > > I now tried that (not with apt-get but manually). I guess I needed the > files: > > .../pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26.orig.tar.gz > .../pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-21.diff.gz > > (ple

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 10:20:13AM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: > Dear Ben, > > >>> kernel-package has an old version of the script templates. > >>> The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain. > >> > >> Where do I find that? > > > > apt-get source linux-2.6

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-07 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben, > kernel-package has an old version of the script templates. > The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain. Where do I find that? >>> >>> apt-get source linux-2.6 >> >> Sorry, am confused. Is that the same as >> apt-get install linux-sour

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-05 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben, >>> kernel-package has an old version of the script templates. >>> The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain. >> >> Where do I find that? > > apt-get source linux-2.6 Sorry, am confused. Is that the same as apt-get install linux-source-2.6.26 which would

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-05 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:10:46PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: > Dear Ben, > > > kernel-package has an old version of the script templates. > > The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain. > > Where do I find that? apt-get source linux-2.6 or svn co svn:

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben, > kernel-package has an old version of the script templates. > The templates used by linux-2.6 are in debian/templates/temp.image.plain. Where do I find that? I am using (working, building on) Debian lenny, building from linux-source-2.6.26-21.tar.bz2 . (Anyway, are not my suggested cha

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:54:33AM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: > Dear Ben, > > > ... If you can provide patches, that would be most helpful. > > See below. I now see that the sources of these files are in package > kernel-package (I do not know how that relates to linux-2.6). > I only

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread paul . szabo
Dear Ben, > ... If you can provide patches, that would be most helpful. See below. I now see that the sources of these files are in package kernel-package (I do not know how that relates to linux-2.6). I only patched the spurious /g modifiers and "cleaned up" the patterns e.g. to anchor at the be

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
The linux-image postinst is known to be in bad shape but we are slowly cleaning it up. If you can provide patches, that would be most helpful. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread paul . szabo
Niko Tyni wrote: > Reassigning now. ... Thanks. > ... you could probably follow up and explain what exactly was incorrect > about running lilo. Looking at my /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-*.postinst files, I see in the code reading and parsing $CONF_LOC = '/etc/kernel-img.conf': ...

Re: Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread Niko Tyni
reassign 568317 linux-2.6 retitle 568317 linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo thanks On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:49:23PM +1100, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote: > This is not a bug in perl, works as documented in 'man perlretut'. Right. > The issue is with the /g modifier, as shown wi

Processed: Re: Bug#568317: linux-image-* postinst did not correctly run lilo

2010-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 568317 linux-2.6 Bug #568317 [perl] perl: Executes every second $_ test only Bug reassigned from package 'perl' to 'linux-2.6'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions perl/5.10.0-19lenny2. > retitle 568317 linux-image-* postinst did no