Hi,
> So this is a different bug.
>
> I've unmerged and reopened #568008 which refers to padlock_sha.
Thanks! I already wondered why some bugs referred to aes and some for sha, but
assumed they were the same as they were merged.
So the sha problem remains. Does "this is safe to ignore" apply to
Forwarded Message
From: Ben Hutchings
To: Ralf Jung
Subject: Re: cryptsetup: strange padlock_aes error during boot
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 12:52:11 +0200
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 12:29 +0200, Ralf Jung wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> thanks a lot for dealing with this issue so quickly. I am
2 matches
Mail list logo
