Bug#550379: acknowledged by developer (closing 550379)

2009-10-18 Thread Michael S Gilbert
reopen 550379 severity 550379 wishlist thanks On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:50:04 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:18 -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote: > [...] > > in one sentence, my request is for the linux-2.6 and linux-kbuild-2.6 > > *source* packages to be merged (they are both i

Processed: Re: Bug#550379: acknowledged by developer (closing 550379)

2009-10-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 550379 Bug #550379 {Done: maximilian attems } [linux-kbuild-2.6] linux-kbulid-2.6: embeds linux-2.6 > severity 550379 wishlist Bug #550379 [linux-kbuild-2.6] linux-kbulid-2.6: embeds linux-2.6 Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important' >

Bug#550379: acknowledged by developer (closing 550379)

2009-10-18 Thread Michael S Gilbert
maybe there is also some confusion due to my use of the term "kbuild binary packages". i am referring to the linux-kbuild-$(uname -r) binary packages when i say that, not the plain old kbuild binary/source package. mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#550379: acknowledged by developer (closing 550379)

2009-10-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:18 -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote: [...] > in one sentence, my request is for the linux-2.6 and linux-kbuild-2.6 > *source* packages to be merged (they are both in main, so there should > be no social reason for this to be impossible). > > consequently, i fully support th

Bug#550379: acknowledged by developer (closing 550379)

2009-10-18 Thread Michael S Gilbert
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:56:57 +0200 maximilian attems wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 03:40:02PM -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote: > > > # explanation given by maintainer > > > close 550379 > > > > there is no explanation in the bug logs. the closest thing to an > > explanation is: > > > > Thi

Bug#550379: acknowledged by developer (closing 550379)

2009-10-18 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 03:40:02PM -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote: > > # explanation given by maintainer > > close 550379 > > there is no explanation in the bug logs. the closest thing to an > explanation is: > > This is not possible for other reasons. > > where the 'other reasons' are never

Bug#550379: acknowledged by developer (closing 550379)

2009-10-18 Thread Michael S Gilbert
> # explanation given by maintainer > close 550379 there is no explanation in the bug logs. the closest thing to an explanation is: This is not possible for other reasons. where the 'other reasons' are never explained. if someone can state these reasons, i would be content to give this up i