On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 12:29:29AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 18:25, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:03:55PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 00:06, Debian Bug Tracking
> >> System wrote:
> >> > Processing comman
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 18:25, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:03:55PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 00:06, Debian Bug Tracking
>> System wrote:
>> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>> >
>> >> clone 543815 -1
>> > Bug#543815:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 18:25:20 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> The problem is that the standard severities cannot be mapped 1:1 on
> the kernel package. Since the kernel is the core component of 99%
> of all Debian systems, it's in the nature of the beast that any
> problem which makes a syst
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:03:55PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 00:06, Debian Bug Tracking
> System wrote:
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> >> clone 543815 -1
> > Bug#543815: initramfs-tools: Having "/lib64" in /etc/ld.so.conf results in
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 00:06, Debian Bug Tracking
System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> clone 543815 -1
> Bug#543815: initramfs-tools: Having "/lib64" in /etc/ld.so.conf results in
> unusable initrd image
> Bug 543815 cloned as bug 544485.
>
>> reassign -1 r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 543815 -1
Bug#543815: initramfs-tools: Having "/lib64" in /etc/ld.so.conf results in
unusable initrd image
Bug 543815 cloned as bug 544485.
> reassign -1 reportbug
Bug #544485 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: Having "/lib64" in
/etc/ld.
clone 543815 -1
reassign -1 reportbug
retitle -1 overinflated linux-2.6 bug reports
stop
dear reportbug maintainer,
never seen this trouble so nicely phrased.
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Stephen Dowdy wrote:
> RE:
> [ Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' Request was from maximilian
> attems
RE:
[ Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' Request was from maximilian
attems ]
I just wanted to point out that i had difficulty determining HOW to address
the severity field in reportbug.
Because i *do* have a workaround to the "problem", it's not critical to *me*
anymore, and wasn't at
8 matches
Mail list logo