Bug#526406: (no subject)

2009-05-19 Thread Mike Dresser
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/dd00f52e93397c9e/6b6814dab9b41a05?#6b6814dab9b41a05 seems to be a similar crash, though I'm not umounting anything when it crashes. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscri

Bug#526406: (no subject)

2009-05-19 Thread Mike Dresser
echo 64 > /sys/block/sdX/queue/max_sectors_kb echo 512 > /sys/block/sdX/queue/nr_requests blockdev --setra 2048 /dev/sdX is what i've set. I'm running XFS on a 8x1TB raid5 on a 3ware 9550SX-16ML, dual opteron 265 with 5gb ram. df -h: /dev/sdb1 6.4T 3.9T 2.6T 61% /files df -ih

Processed: Re: Bug#526406: (no subject)

2009-05-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 526406 linux-2.6 Bug#526406: linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64: Kernel BUG 2.6.29 + cpufreq on heavy load Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64' Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.29-1-amd64' to `linux-2.6'. > -- Stopp

Bug#526406: (no subject)

2009-05-06 Thread Mike Dresser
Saw a crash last night when the governors were set to performance, so I don't think this is a cpufreq issue. I'm removing the cpufreq support in my kernel just to verify.. Also, it does the same thing with 2.6.29.2 System has 5GB ram, 32gb swap. Last night's kernel bug: May 5 19:45:38 x ker

Bug#526406: (no subject)

2009-05-05 Thread Mike Dresser
I can confirm this bug, as I'm seeing the same type of crashes you are seeing for about a month now. Our server is a BackupPC machine that moves several hundred gb of data a night over ethernet, along with a lot of disk activity. System is a dual cpu, Opteron 265(2x2 cores) on a Tyan K8WE mot