Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability

2009-04-19 Thread Michael S. Gilbert
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:50:54 -0600 dann frazier wrote: > > > The support for dynamically loadable kernel modules in Linux can be > > > abuses similarly. Does that make it a "grave security issue"? > > > > probably...at least until someone comes up with a secure way to do it. > > Oh, come on. >

Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability

2009-04-16 Thread Michael S. Gilbert
btw, redhat-based distros are thought to be invulnerable to these attacks due their incorporation of execshield (in particular, due to address space randomization). perhaps it's high time that debian consider doing the same? i know that execshield is not in the vanilla kernel, but when it comes to

Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability

2009-04-16 Thread Michael S. Gilbert
reopen 524373 thanks On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:53:38 -0400 Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 04:21:10PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote: > > > > i think that any flaw that allows an attacker to elevate his pwnage from > > root to hidden should always be considered a grave security issu

Processed: Re: Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 524373 Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability

2009-04-16 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 04:21:10PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote: > > i think that any flaw that allows an attacker to elevate his pwnage from > root to hidden should always be considered a grave security issue. Your argument sounds like the one used by RIAA, MPAA etc, based on the DMCA's anti-

Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability

2009-04-16 Thread Michael S. Gilbert
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:43:07 -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:55:05AM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote: > > as seen in recent articles and discussions, the linux kernel is > > currently vulnerable to rootkit attacks via the /dev/mem device. one > > article [1] mentions tha

Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability

2009-04-16 Thread dann frazier
severity 524373 wishlist thanks On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:55:05AM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote: > package: linux-2.6 > severity: grave > tags: security > > as seen in recent articles and discussions, the linux kernel is > currently vulnerable to rootkit attacks via the /dev/mem device. one >

Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability

2009-04-16 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:55:05AM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote: > as seen in recent articles and discussions, the linux kernel is > currently vulnerable to rootkit attacks via the /dev/mem device. one > article [1] mentions that there is an existing patch for the problem, > but does not link t

Bug#524373: linux-2.6: /dev/mem rootkit vulnerability

2009-04-16 Thread Michael S. Gilbert
package: linux-2.6 severity: grave tags: security as seen in recent articles and discussions, the linux kernel is currently vulnerable to rootkit attacks via the /dev/mem device. one article [1] mentions that there is an existing patch for the problem, but does not link to it. perhaps this fix c