On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:46:35PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello jsw,
>
> please post your bnx2x patch to net...@vger.kernel.org
> so that it can be reviewed and merged upstream!
I have sent an updated version of the patch to the netdev list:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg93
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 05:31:03PM +0300, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:30 -0700, John Wright wrote:
> Hi John,
> > >
> > > You are right - I'm adding a licensing to bnx2x_init_values.h similar
> > > to the bnx2 license that you quoted. However, I'm not sure if now is a
> > >
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:30 -0700, John Wright wrote:
Hi John,
> >
> > You are right - I'm adding a licensing to bnx2x_init_values.h similar
> > to the bnx2 license that you quoted. However, I'm not sure if now is a
> > good time to send such a patch to netdev for net-2.6 so I'm sending it
> > to
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, John Wright wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:46:35PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > hello jsw,
> >
> > please post your bnx2x patch to net...@vger.kernel.org
> > so that it can be reviewed and merged upstream!
>
> I was waiting on Eilon's licensing patch to make it
Hi Eilon,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 04:17:51AM -0700, Eilon Greenstein wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> You are right - I'm adding a licensing to bnx2x_init_values.h similar
> to the bnx2 license that you quoted. However, I'm not sure if now is a
> good time to send such a patch to netdev for net-2.6 so I'm s
Hi maks,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:46:35PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> hello jsw,
>
> please post your bnx2x patch to net...@vger.kernel.org
> so that it can be reviewed and merged upstream!
I was waiting on Eilon's licensing patch to make it into net-next, but I
see that it's been there
hello jsw,
please post your bnx2x patch to net...@vger.kernel.org
so that it can be reviewed and merged upstream!
thanks :)
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi John,
You are right - I'm adding a licensing to bnx2x_init_values.h similar to the
bnx2 license that you quoted. However, I'm not sure if now is a good time to
send such a patch to netdev for net-2.6 so I'm sending it to net-next - please
let me know if this is not enough.
Regards,
Eilon
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 13:05 -0600, John Wright wrote:
> Hi Eilon,
>
> In bnx2x_init_values.h, there appear to be several sourceless firmware
> blobs (init_data_*, *_int_table_data_*, and arguably init_ops).
[...]
init_ops looks like a plausible "preferred form for modification" to me.
It's not ve
Hi Eilon,
In bnx2x_init_values.h, there appear to be several sourceless firmware
blobs (init_data_*, *_int_table_data_*, and arguably init_ops). So far,
Debian has removed this file from our distribution of linux-2.6 and
disabled the driver. In order to allow Debian users to use bnx2x, I
have wr
10 matches
Mail list logo
